Eu4 ideal army composition.

Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by KaseyB. What should Horde army composition be in mid-late game? It's 1624 and I can build armies with western units on a vassals provinces (when did this happen? it's amazing!). I'm currently running 8 merc infantry, 7 cav and 5 cannon for individual units of 20. I have a huge income so money isn't really a problem.Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by R1ZZO_ Army composition . What is a good army composition for the longest time I've been doing 16/4/10 is this a good ratio if not please enlighten me This thread is archived New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast comments sorted by ...Enjoy stack wiping the enemy stacks. On the defense, do not max cav-to-inf. You'll want stacks of X infantry and 4 cav with X being equal to the enemy's front line units. Let's say they have 6 inf and 2 cav. On the defense, you'll want 8 inf and 4 cav. 1. So ive got a grasp on almost every mechanic in EU4 , except for one , unit composition and ...Usually the advice is to keep between 0-4 cavalry in any of your armies. Also, don't use the AI as the best example of army composition. They use way too many cavalry, and not enough artillery. Late game with max combat width (40) I do 40/0/40 and split it into 2 stacks of 20/0/20 since attrition is a thing.

A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by Paradox Development Studio. Members Online 1664 Ottomans: 100 Decadence, Crap ton of rebels, powerful allies, disloyal states. wallachia wasnt that difficult, summon3 mercs before unpause, ally bosnia, take improve prestige mission, start running towards serbia, no CB serbia when first mercs pop up, before hungary warn, your army is now bigger than bosnia so serbs will go for bosnia, annex serbia and carry on with bosnia/ragusa/italy. 1.Initially you only have the flanking range to have 4 cav per army but after tech 18 you can have 6 and if you have good cav you might want to. Flanking range still grows after that but more than 6 cav is wrong unless you're stacking all the cavalry bonuses and playing without infantry entirely.

Reducing maintenance is usually enough, but if you still have financial problems then something is wrong. I assume your army composition is too expensive, most likely too many cavalry. 2 cavalries in an army are generally enough for every nation throughout the game until you ditch them completely in the mid- to endgame, except specific ones that have significant cavalry boni like Poland or any ...

The optimal army for every combat is the same width as the enemy army + 2 cavallry and if after military tech 16 you also want the same width of artillery. yes for optimal play. You need to redo your army for every encounter.Active-Cow-8259. • 1 yr. ago. 1.35 doesnt really Change Combat as far as I know. If you dont know much about composition Here is the most important stuff. You should allways try to fill the combat with (cw) in the front row (infrantry + cavalery). The backrow is only used by the artillery, so artillery allways adds extra damage, however ...If you ever go for Aristocratic first idea in the first war against Ming if you're not confident or have scored trading in livestock via deving the shit out of your stated provinces or conquest, cavalry becomes better. And the higher your shock pip vs the enemy, the bigger advantage you'd get from cavalry.The "Ideal" army composistion late game is enough cannons to fill the back row, so whatever your combat width is. Then 6 or 4 calvary units for flanking attacks, then just infantry afterwards. For a 30 stack, I normally will run 16-4-10. Reply.An army with full infantry/artillery in the 1700s can easily devour pure infantry armies with the same cost (4 rounds of full combat width infantry), simply because by tech 22, artillery will be doing the same amount of damage compared to a full strength infantry, and their damage does not go down like the front line infantries, as they do not ...

You get a unique Cossack Republic government type called "Sich Rada" which prioritizes cavalry. You basically start the game with +40% cavalry combat ability and you can stack even more in fairly short order. Here are some sources of cavalry combat ability: +20% Sich Rada government reform. +20% Cossacks estate.

Since it's base morale too, it is modified by any morale modifiers Benin has. So if you have 3 base morale (being a tech behind) and have a 10% morale of armies advisor, your total morale is 3.3. If Benin has 4 base morale and a 10% morale of armies advisor, his morale is 4.4. That is an enormous gulf in morale, and explains why you need so ...

Army composition for every single country, with maybe like 3-5 exceptions, in the game is extremely simple: 1. Use your initial cav only till the first battle. Merge until you end up with 0. Never recruit more cavalry. 2. Always try to move with stacks of infantry equal to combat width. If combat width is 20, have a stack of 20 infantry.Initially you only have the flanking range to have 4 cav per army but after tech 18 you can have 6 and if you have good cav you might want to. Flanking range still grows after that but more than 6 cav is wrong unless you're stacking all the cavalry bonuses and playing without infantry entirely.Go to eu4 r/eu4. r/eu4. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by Paradox Development Studio. ... But i have a question about the ideal army composition for sweden (both early and lategame) and what ideas i should take. And also is there any other way to get the vasa dynasty than ...But the eu4 province Lorraine is not in the Elsass-Lothringen you are thinking about. If you take ww1 borders (which is what's mostly seen as "ideal Germany" around here, Lorraine is not in it. If you take HRE borders, a good part of Belgium and Franche-comte is a part too.Aug 6, 2020 @ 6:38am. "This video explains the best EU4 Army Composition by Century starting from your 1444 army to the 1821 end date, with an army reform every 50 years or so. If you'd like to find out …For a standard nation without any special cavalry bonuses: Tech 1-16: 4 cavalry and the rest of combat width of infantry. Tech 7: add at least 1 cannon to the fighting stack, to get +1 at siege.Ideal army composition for every tech Mil tech Combat width Infantry Cavalry Cannons Total Comments 0 15 17 4 0 21 For the reasoning behind this, see Zwirbaum's great unit guide. 2 20 22 4 0 26 Or this video by darkfireslide 5 22 24 4 0 28 If you find yourself to be a horde you may want to ignore all this and go full cavalry; I'm not sure if ...

There are certain technology milestones that will affect your army composition in an ideal world. Having artillery in your army will grant a bonus to …However, if you want to optimize for combat strength, optimal army composition is always, i.e. from the start of the game, a full back row of artillery, as much cavalry as your ratio can afford and the rest infantry, obviously modified to account for any casualties. Before tech 13/16, however, such a composition is grossly cost-ineffective.I'm a new player and I was just wondering about the ideal army compositions,, especially for Russia if it's nation specific ... This spreadsheet have good army composition and can direct you to more in-depth guide: ... r/eu4. r/eu4. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by ...Roughly meaning you could see a horde army beat a western army 2-3 times its size. As western army as you can see has the same 3 pips on its cavalry and infantry at levels 5-8 and only half the army can be cavalry. In theory a 50/50 infantry/cavalry army would be the best choice. However it's much more expensive and not all that more effective.Ttttttitle edit: *ideal. Same as western. Full combat width of arty with full combat width of junk in front, plus extra to avoid casualties creating flanking...and a couple cavalry to do flanking of your own if they're not at full CW.Ideal Army Composition and Unit Types in Eu4 - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or view presentation slides online. Scribd is the world's largest social reading and publishing site.Not as a horde with 100% cav ratio. Full front line of banner cav with a full line of cannons in the back will stackwipe almost anything or atleast deal tremendous damage to the enemy. Manpower is no problem for banner units so just make sure to get a decent economy. No. Cav remain better than inf throughout the game.

If memory serves right, in 1650 your combat width should be around 32. So a good army composition might be 32 front row infantry + 8 spare units = 40 infantry and 21 artillery to get the maximum siege bonus on a star fort capital (level 6 + 1). You can go all the way up to 32 artillery, if you can afford that.

Sep 2, 2020 · Heavies only is the ideal naval composition. Naval engagement width has a base of 25. It is not increased by tech, unlike army combat width. It is only increased by a couple of policies you'll never use (because they both require Naval idea group), as well as a context based 10% increase in coastal seas. At 40 combat width, undisputed optimal army composition is 32-8-40. This is making some assumptions about having a reinforcement stack nearby if you happen to engage an equal size stack. Less than 40 combat width, which means lower miltech and therefore lower supply limits is more disputed.Quick and dirty army composition: I/C/A = width/4/width (incl which unit type to pick) Tip. TLDR: for the easiest good template: use infantry and cannons equal to your combat width, and add 4 horses. Before tech 16, pick inf and cav with the best offensive shock pips, and arty doesn't matter. After tech 16, pick inf with the best defensive fire ...Ideal Army composition for Russia? I'm playing Extended Timeline, using 50.000-men stacks, on the 2010s.What are the best army composition for different technologies?That guide is pretty good, there's a lazy mans variant though which is slightly more fiddly in battle but less attrition and ideal for splitting for rebel suppression. Start: 18/2/0 (16/4 if your tech / ideas has good cav) Tech 7: 17/2/1 (15/4/1 if good cav, 1 artillery for sieges mostly so can be in a dedicated army)AddeRunn. •. If you often are doing big battles (like in multiplayer) you need multiple cannon stacks to reinforce with, since cannons now take morale damage and will retreat as regular infantry after a while. If you only play single player this will likely not happen as frequently, so you can still use the same composition as before. If you're at 63% Cavalry Combat Bonus that means that you're infantry has 20% Infantry Combat Bonus (Piechota Wybraniecka & Quality Ideas), what if I go half and half with a full combat width of Artillery. 63% Cavalry Combat Ability seems like it would chew through their flanks in no time. I use 8:8:8. Apr 9, 2019 · Part 3 of a 4 part series on basics of combat and combat related mechanics. In this part, we discuss ideal army composition and why use of cavalry should be ... Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by ... Army composition is extremely important. If you have too many cannons and not enough infantry, your cannons will be slaughtered. On the other hand, if you don't have enough cannons, your enemy will outgun you. ... Ideal (late game) will be combat width number of infantry and cannons, and 4 cavalry.

Ignoring very special edge cases (like nations with massive Cav modifiers) the best army composition is combat width Infantry (for front row) + combat width Cannons …

Optimal damage-maximizing composition is based on the Combat Width (CW) value. The ideal scenario is having the full CW value worth of artillery (back row) and the CW value worth of infantry, minus X number of cav regiments. X is the (flanking range of cavalry)*2, one set of full flanking range cav on each flank.

If your army composition doesn't have heavy ships and cogs, you're doing it wrong. Archived post. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. the plot thickens. That explain the strength of French armies...those cannons on the Carracks man! Galleys4lyfe.The best I've come up with is to use your combat width. Infantry = 1.5 times the width. Cavalry = .5 times the width. Artillery = 1 times the width. A combat width of 10 gives you an army of 15 infantry, 5 cavalry and 10 artillery. This allows reserves for both inf. and cav. and a full row of artillery. Reply.This is the correct answer. While horde cav is less inefficient than other cav in terms of power for money, you're still better off using infantry - especially since the hordes usually do not have a great economic situation for most of the game.There's more or less no reason to not just use all 1:1 cav/cannon armies unless the 100% ratio thing changes for some reason. The reason is money. Hordes are poor. As much cavalry as possible. Merc infantry to siege/fill out the ranks a bit. No costs for reinforcement means merc infantry is more worthwhile, unfortunately merc cavalry is still ...Cavalry heavy armies are just a nightmare to micromanage and one of the things I wish Paradox would recode: As a novice at EU4, I loved playing Poland. I would go 10/10, or 12/8 infantry/cavlary armies and I would get shredded because my infantry died and then I took a huge tactics penalty because I had too much cavalry to infantry ratio.A well-composed photograph is really a matter of opinion, but there are a few tricks that tend to result in better pictures. That's what we're going to take a look at today. A well...Sort by: Gilad1. •. Build more cavalry. There really isn't an ideal composition for eu4 armies. It's to have enough infantry so that Calvary doesn't get the not enough support malus and enough infantry and Calvary that artillery will not be on the front line. Ideal army composition is enough artillery for combat width post tech 15ish and ...It's accurate to have wastelands in these provinces for balance, but also 2 other reasons: 1: They were isolated, 'undiscovered' or otherwise inaccesible well into the 19th century, it would be ahistorical for them to be provinces. 2: Technology didn't allow these areas to be colonised. Railways and steam vessels were a major development that ...Concrete is thinner, stronger and more durable than mortar; whereas mortar is used as a bonding agent between building materials, concrete is used for structural projects, such as ...Qing army composition (non horde) I can't seem to find any good info on what army composition to use for a non horde qing. I formed it from Korea so I only have 50% cavalry to infantry ratio and I've never played an eastern nation with cab bonuses before so I'd like any advice. Assuming you took qing ideas it should be whatever cav you ...First understand that there is NOT a single 'best' army composition: its somewhat situational and preference dependent. Some factors that you might be balancing between: unit combat ability in national ideas; amount of money available; amount of manpower available; amount of supply limit; amount of guns needed for fort level; combat width; ease of forming the stacks back up after playtime; etc..

Saddled with student loans and unable to find work that will pay even the most basic bills, Devon turned to the Army. Devon always dreamed of becoming a journalist. And while he wa...Also, cavalry are flat out inferior to infantry at mil6 (unless you have an insane shock general) so at that specific point the ideal army has 0 cavalry (or 2 to flank if enemy army is smaller than combat width). Also, the "ideal" army has full combat-width cannons as soon as they are invented.I am doing more or less fine in my second game and have learned to go after separated stacks, use terrain to my advantage and allocate generals…Instagram:https://instagram. level f vocab unit 3ghrist vet clinic carrolltonxfinity channel guide printablestonefire grill menu prices So, without army composition, the AI can't make shit armies, and the newer players can't make terrible armies, loose, and stop the game or just follow mechanically a guide that is bad but failproof. I'm also guilty of playing 2 cav-rest inf-canons up to battle width like the vast majority of players, and I don't switch to 50%cav on cav techs ...Subreddit for the Europa Universalis IV, Crusader Kings 3 and Victoria 3 mod Anbennar and its fantasy setting Members Online If I'm playing Adencia or Marhold or even non-tribal Jadd, what should my ideal army composition be throughout the campaign due to their massive cav bonuses? bed buddy walmartgarage sales georgetown ky 3. Sort by: cousin_pat115. • 1 yr. ago. Combat width at tech 26 is 40, so you would need 40 units in the front row (infanty, cavalry) and preferably 40 units in the back row (artillery.) If your supply limit in a certain province isn’t high enough to support an 80 stack, just split them into 2 40 stacks until you have to siege a fort/fight ...Army composition = (A = W) + 4C + (Ax2 or Ax3)I, where A (rtillery), W (idth of combat), C (avalry) and I (fantry). Basically I use double or triple my artillery in infantry. Using a "spare" army to follow your arty is smart, because it allows you … athleta collegeville Im currently playing extended timeline as bulgaria and its 876, i had some problems fighting non horde nations (same mil tech lvl) so what army composition should i use? Archived post. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.Calm has yet to return. This post has been updated. Calm has yet to return to Pulwama district in the restive Indian state of Jammu & Kashmir. Early this morning (Feb. 18), four In...